|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
16/09/2014 |
Actualizado : |
18/06/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
VÁZQUEZ, D.; BERGER, A.G.; CUNIBERTI , M.; BAINOTTI , C.; ZAVARIZ DE MIRANDA , M.; SCHEEREN , P.L.; JOBET, C.; ZÚÑIGA, J.; CABRERA, G.; VERGES, R.; PEÑA, R.J |
Afiliación : |
DANIEL VÁZQUEZ PEYRONEL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDRES GUSTAVO BERGER RICCA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Influence of cultivar and environment on quality of Latin American wheats. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2012 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of cereal science , v. 56, n.2, p. 196-203, 2012. |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.jcs.2012.03.004 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 15 August 2011 / Received in revised form / 20 March 2012 / Accepted 27 March 2012. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Wheat consumption is growing, with processors asking for wheat-based products showing better and more consistent quality. Genotype, environment and their interaction (G #1; E) play an important role in the final expression of quality attributes. An international research consortium was developed in order to evaluate the magnitude of genotype, environment and G #1; E effects on wheat quality of cultivars developed for different agro-ecological zones in Latin America. Genotypes released in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay and Uruguay, were cultivated in twenty different environments within the participating countries. Each environment was characterized for cultural practices, soil type and climatic conditions. Grain yield and analyses of test weight, protein, ash, gluten, Alveograph, Farinograph, Falling Number, SDS sedimentation and flour color were determined. Allelic variations of puroindolines and
glutenins were determined in all the genotypes evaluated. Both puroindoline and gluten protein alleles corresponded to genotypes possessing medium to very good bread making quality. Large variability for most quality attributes evaluated was observed, with wider ranges in quality parameters across environments than among genotypes; even for parameters known to be largely determined by genotype. The importance of growing environment on grain quality was proved, suggesting that breeders’ quality objectives should be adapted to the targeted environments.
#1; 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved MenosABSTRACT.
Wheat consumption is growing, with processors asking for wheat-based products showing better and more consistent quality. Genotype, environment and their interaction (G #1; E) play an important role in the final expression of quality attributes. An international research consortium was developed in order to evaluate the magnitude of genotype, environment and G #1; E effects on wheat quality of cultivars developed for different agro-ecological zones in Latin America. Genotypes released in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay and Uruguay, were cultivated in twenty different environments within the participating countries. Each environment was characterized for cultural practices, soil type and climatic conditions. Grain yield and analyses of test weight, protein, ash, gluten, Alveograph, Farinograph, Falling Number, SDS sedimentation and flour color were determined. Allelic variations of puroindolines and
glutenins were determined in all the genotypes evaluated. Both puroindoline and gluten protein alleles corresponded to genotypes possessing medium to very good bread making quality. Large variability for most quality attributes evaluated was observed, with wider ranges in quality parameters across environments than among genotypes; even for parameters known to be largely determined by genotype. The importance of growing environment on grain quality was proved, suggesting that breeders’ quality objectives should be adapted to the targeted environments.
#1; 201... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CALIDAD DE TRIGO; GENOTIPO; INTERACCIÓN GXE; MEDIO AMBIENTE. |
Thesagro : |
MEJORAMIENTO CULTIVOS DE INVIERNO. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
Marc : |
LEADER 02557naa a2200325 a 4500 001 1050322 005 2019-06-18 008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.jcs.2012.03.004$2DOI 100 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, D. 245 $aInfluence of cultivar and environment on quality of Latin American wheats.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2012 500 $aArticle history: Received 15 August 2011 / Received in revised form / 20 March 2012 / Accepted 27 March 2012. 520 $aABSTRACT. Wheat consumption is growing, with processors asking for wheat-based products showing better and more consistent quality. Genotype, environment and their interaction (G #1; E) play an important role in the final expression of quality attributes. An international research consortium was developed in order to evaluate the magnitude of genotype, environment and G #1; E effects on wheat quality of cultivars developed for different agro-ecological zones in Latin America. Genotypes released in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay and Uruguay, were cultivated in twenty different environments within the participating countries. Each environment was characterized for cultural practices, soil type and climatic conditions. Grain yield and analyses of test weight, protein, ash, gluten, Alveograph, Farinograph, Falling Number, SDS sedimentation and flour color were determined. Allelic variations of puroindolines and glutenins were determined in all the genotypes evaluated. Both puroindoline and gluten protein alleles corresponded to genotypes possessing medium to very good bread making quality. Large variability for most quality attributes evaluated was observed, with wider ranges in quality parameters across environments than among genotypes; even for parameters known to be largely determined by genotype. The importance of growing environment on grain quality was proved, suggesting that breeders’ quality objectives should be adapted to the targeted environments. #1; 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved 650 $aMEJORAMIENTO CULTIVOS DE INVIERNO 653 $aCALIDAD DE TRIGO 653 $aGENOTIPO 653 $aINTERACCIÓN GXE 653 $aMEDIO AMBIENTE 700 1 $aBERGER, A.G. 700 1 $aCUNIBERTI , M. 700 1 $aBAINOTTI , C. 700 1 $aZAVARIZ DE MIRANDA , M. 700 1 $aSCHEEREN , P.L. 700 1 $aJOBET, C. 700 1 $aZÚÑIGA, J. 700 1 $aCABRERA, G. 700 1 $aVERGES, R. 700 1 $aPEÑA, R.J 773 $tJournal of cereal science$gv. 56, n.2, p. 196-203, 2012.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
30/09/2021 |
Actualizado : |
30/09/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Serie Técnica |
Autor : |
FERNÁNDEZ, G.; PEREZ, E.; PINTOS, P.; BLANCO, O.; PLAZA, P.; SISQUELLA, M.; PASTORE, A.; LADO, J. |
Afiliación : |
GERÓNIMO FERNÁNDEZ, Unión de productores y exportadores de frutas del Uruguay (UPEFRUY), Montevideo, Uruguay.; ELENA PEREZ FAGGIANI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PEDRO MAXIMILIANO PINTOS RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ORIBE BLANCO MARTINEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PILAR PLAZA, Servicio técnico Postcosecha. Instituto de investigación y tecnología agroalimentarias (IRTA), Parc Científic i Tecnològic Agroalimentari de Lleida (PCiTAL), Catalunya, España.; MARÍA SISQUELLA, Servicio técnico Postcosecha. Instituto de investigación y tecnología agroalimentarias (IRTA), Parc Científic i Tecnològic Agroalimentari de Lleida (PCiTAL), Catalunya, España.; ANDREA PASTORE, URUD’OR S.A., Montevideo, Uruguay.; JOANNA LADO LINDNER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Red tecnológica sectorial para la innovación en postcosecha de frutos cítricos: principales resultados. [Innovation network in citrus fruit postharvest: main goals.] |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2021. Doi: http://doi.org/10.35676/INIA/ST.258 |
Páginas : |
48 p. |
Serie : |
(INIA Serie Técnica; 258). |
ISSN : |
1688-9266 |
DOI : |
e-ISBN 978-9974-38-459-0 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
RESUMEN - La industria citrícola uruguaya está orientada principalmente a la exportación de fruta fresca. El mercado internacional de cítricos es competitivo, dinámico y exige cambios permanentes. A nivel nacional se encontró una brecha importante entre los conocimientos generados y las tecnologías utilizadas por las empresas en el manejo postcosecha de frutos cítricos. Por ello surgió la iniciativa de conformar una Red Tecnológica Sectorial para la innovación en postcosecha de frutos cítricos (ANII, RTS_1_2016_1_127275).
ABSTRACT - The objective of the Uruguayan citrus industry is to export fresh fruit to different distant markets. The international citrus business is competitive, dynamic and demands permanent changes. In Uruguay, an important gap was found between the knowledge generated and the technologies incorporated by the companies in the postharvest handling of citrus fruits. For this reason, an inter-company network was created for innovation in postharvest of citrus fruits (ANII, RTS_1_2016_1_127275). |
Palabras claves : |
INVESTIGACIÓN ASOCIATIVA; MANEJO POSTCOSECHA; TRABAJO EN RED. |
Thesagro : |
CITRUS (652); INNOVACION; TECNOLOGIA DE POSTCOSECHA. |
NAL Tesauro : |
Citrus, innovación, investigación asociativa, manejo postcosecha, trabajo en red. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16027/1/st-258-2021.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02147nam a2200325 a 4500 001 1062442 005 2021-09-30 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1688-9266 024 7 $ae-ISBN 978-9974-38-459-0$2DOI 100 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ, G. 245 $aRed tecnológica sectorial para la innovación en postcosecha de frutos cítricos$bprincipales resultados. [Innovation network in citrus fruit postharvest: main goals.]$h[electronic resource] 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2021. Doi: http://doi.org/10.35676/INIA/ST.258$c2021 300 $a48 p. 490 $a(INIA Serie Técnica; 258). 520 $aRESUMEN - La industria citrícola uruguaya está orientada principalmente a la exportación de fruta fresca. El mercado internacional de cítricos es competitivo, dinámico y exige cambios permanentes. A nivel nacional se encontró una brecha importante entre los conocimientos generados y las tecnologías utilizadas por las empresas en el manejo postcosecha de frutos cítricos. Por ello surgió la iniciativa de conformar una Red Tecnológica Sectorial para la innovación en postcosecha de frutos cítricos (ANII, RTS_1_2016_1_127275). ABSTRACT - The objective of the Uruguayan citrus industry is to export fresh fruit to different distant markets. The international citrus business is competitive, dynamic and demands permanent changes. In Uruguay, an important gap was found between the knowledge generated and the technologies incorporated by the companies in the postharvest handling of citrus fruits. For this reason, an inter-company network was created for innovation in postharvest of citrus fruits (ANII, RTS_1_2016_1_127275). 650 $aCitrus, innovación, investigación asociativa, manejo postcosecha, trabajo en red 650 $aCITRUS (652) 650 $aINNOVACION 650 $aTECNOLOGIA DE POSTCOSECHA 653 $aINVESTIGACIÓN ASOCIATIVA 653 $aMANEJO POSTCOSECHA 653 $aTRABAJO EN RED 700 1 $aPEREZ, E. 700 1 $aPINTOS, P. 700 1 $aBLANCO, O. 700 1 $aPLAZA, P. 700 1 $aSISQUELLA, M. 700 1 $aPASTORE, A. 700 1 $aLADO, J.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|